32. Disability Rights & Accessibility
DISABILITY RIGHTS & ACCESSIBILITY
Dave Biggers for Louisville Mayor
Policy Area: Disability Rights & Accessibility
Last Updated: October 30, 2025
Status: Final Draft
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Louisville’s 78,000 residents with disabilities (12% of population) face systematic exclusion from full participation in community life through inaccessible infrastructure, employment discrimination, inadequate services, and barriers to independent living. Thirty-five years after the Americans with Disabilities Act, Louisville remains largely inaccessible—forcing people with disabilities into segregation, dependence, and poverty rather than enabling full inclusion and contribution.
The Challenge
Louisville’s disability rights and accessibility crisis shows up in stark numbers:
Inaccessible Infrastructure: Only 34% of Louisville sidewalks have curb cuts, 47% of public buildings fail ADA compliance audits, and 62% of TARC bus stops lack accessible boarding areas—creating physical barriers excluding people with disabilities from jobs, services, and community participation.
Employment Discrimination: Only 28% of working-age Louisville residents with disabilities are employed (vs. 76% without disabilities)—a 48-percentage-point gap driven by discrimination, inaccessible workplaces, and benefit cliffs that punish work—resulting in poverty rate of 32% among people with disabilities (vs. 14% overall).
Segregation & Institutionalization: 3,200 Louisville residents with disabilities live in institutional settings (nursing homes, group homes) despite wanting to live independently—forced segregation due to inadequate home and community-based services, housing accessibility, and support.
Inadequate Services: 2,400 people with disabilities are on waiting lists for home care services (average wait: 4.5 years), only 18% of Louisville housing stock is accessible, and assistive technology programs serve <10% of those needing adaptive equipment—barriers forcing dependence rather than enabling independence.
Exclusion from Decision-Making: Metro government has no disability advisory commission, ADA compliance is unenforced, and people with disabilities are excluded from planning processes affecting their lives—”nothing about us without us” principle violated daily.
Dave’s Vision
Dave will transform Louisville into a fully accessible, inclusive city where people with disabilities participate equally in all aspects of community life—employment, housing, transportation, public spaces, civic engagement—through universal design, enforced accessibility standards, comprehensive services, and leadership by people with disabilities themselves.
Universal Accessibility Infrastructure ($10M annually): Achieve full ADA compliance through sidewalk curb cuts, accessible public buildings, transit accessibility, and universal design standards—eliminating physical barriers excluding people with disabilities from community participation.
Employment & Economic Inclusion ($5M annually): Increase employment rate for people with disabilities from 28% to 45% through supported employment, workplace accessibility, benefits counseling, and anti-discrimination enforcement—ending poverty driven by employment exclusion.
Independent Living Services ($8M annually): Move 800 people from institutional settings to community living, eliminate service waiting lists, provide assistive technology, and fund personal care assistance—enabling independence and self-determination.
Accessible Housing Expansion ($4M annually): Create 400 accessible affordable housing units, provide home modifications, and require accessibility in all subsidized housing—ensuring people with disabilities can live where they choose.
Disability Rights & Leadership ($1M annually): Establish Disability Rights Commission with enforcement authority, ensure people with disabilities lead policy affecting them, and create disability cultural center—shifting from charity model to rights-based approach.
Budget Impact
This policy requires $28 million in new annual spending—funded through federal disability grants ($12M), Medicaid partnerships ($8M), ADA violation fines ($2M), General Fund ($4M), and philanthropic partnerships ($2M). Economic analysis projects $196-252M in annual economic returns (7-9x ROI) through increased employment/tax revenue, reduced institutionalization costs, healthcare savings, and economic participation.
Why This Matters
Disability is a civil rights issue, not a charity issue. The ADA established that people with disabilities have the right to full participation in society—yet Louisville violates these rights daily through inaccessible infrastructure, employment discrimination, and forced segregation. Accessibility isn’t accommodation, it’s justice.
Inaccessibility is expensive. Keeping people with disabilities in institutions costs $75,000-$125,000/year vs. $25,000-$35,000 for community living with support. Every 100 people moved from institutions to community saves $5-9M annually while improving quality of life. Louisville currently institutionalizes 3,200 people—potential savings of $160-288M annually.
Employment exclusion wastes talent and creates poverty. When only 28% of working-age people with disabilities are employed (vs. 76% overall), we waste talent while creating poverty requiring public support. If Louisville matched national disability employment (34%), we’d add 1,400+ taxpaying workers contributing $42M in annual wages—while reducing SSI/SSDI dependence.
Segregation harms everyone. When people with disabilities are excluded from schools, workplaces, and community spaces, non-disabled people grow up without understanding disability—perpetuating discrimination and exclusion. Inclusion benefits everyone through diversity, innovation, and fuller humanity.
Universal design helps everyone. Curb cuts help people with strollers, luggage, wheelchairs. Automatic doors help people carrying packages, using mobility devices, with arthritis. Captioning helps people learning English, in noisy environments, with hearing loss. Designing for disability improves usability for all.
Dave’s policy will end segregation, achieve full accessibility, eliminate employment discrimination, enable independent living, and ensure people with disabilities lead Louisville’s transformation. It’s about fulfilling the promise of the ADA 35 years later.
CURRENT SITUATION ANALYSIS
Louisville’s Disability Demographics
Population with Disabilities:
– Total: 78,000 Louisville residents (12% of population)
– Working-age (18-64): 48,000 (11% of working-age population)
– Seniors (65+): 30,000 (26% of seniors—disability increases with age)
Disability Types (people may have multiple):
– Mobility: 38,000 (49%)—difficulty walking, climbing stairs
– Cognitive: 28,000 (36%)—difficulty concentrating, remembering, making decisions
– Independent Living: 24,000 (31%)—difficulty doing errands alone
– Self-Care: 18,000 (23%)—difficulty dressing, bathing
– Vision: 14,000 (18%)—blind or serious vision difficulty
– Hearing: 12,000 (15%)—deaf or serious hearing difficulty
Intersectionality:
– Disability + Poverty: 32% of people with disabilities live in poverty (vs. 14% overall)—2.3x higher
– Disability + Race: Black residents 1.4x more likely to have disability than white residents
– Disability + Age: 26% of seniors have disabilities vs. 6% of working-age adults
Infrastructure Accessibility Crisis
Louisville’s infrastructure systematically excludes people with disabilities:
Sidewalk Accessibility:
– Curb Cuts: Only 34% of Louisville sidewalks have curb cuts at intersections (vs. 100% ADA requirement)
– Sidewalk Width: 42% of sidewalks <48 inches wide (ADA minimum for wheelchair passage)
– Surface Condition: 38% of sidewalks have cracks, heaves, or deterioration creating tripping hazards and impassable wheelchair barriers
– Obstructions: 28% of sidewalks have poles, signs, trees, or other obstructions in path of travel
Result: People using wheelchairs, walkers, or mobility devices cannot safely navigate most Louisville neighborhoods.
Public Building Accessibility:
– Metro Government Buildings: 47% fail ADA compliance audits (inaccessible entrances, restrooms, parking, signage)
– Libraries: 8 of 18 branches fail accessibility standards
– Recreation Centers: 14 of 22 have accessibility violations
– Historic Buildings: Many exempt from accessibility requirements despite public use
Public Transportation:
– TARC Buses: 100% of buses wheelchair accessible (ADA compliance)
– BUT Bus Stops: 62% of stops lack accessible boarding areas (level pad, clear path of travel)
– Shelters: Only 18% of bus shelters accessible to wheelchair users
– Paratransit (TARC3):
– Serves 3,800 people with disabilities unable to use fixed-route
– 24-hour advance reservation required (vs. spontaneous use of regular transit)
– Average wait time: 45 minutes (vs. 15 minutes for fixed-route)
– Capacity constraints: 800+ denied trips monthly due to capacity
Parks & Recreation:
– Accessible Playgrounds: Only 12% of playgrounds have accessible play equipment
– Trails: <5% of Louisville Loop and other trails meet accessibility standards
– Restrooms: 34% of park restrooms inaccessible
– Programming: Most recreation programs not designed for people with disabilities
Parking:
– Accessible Parking Spaces: Many lots have required number but spaces too narrow, lack access aisles, or blocked by barriers
– Enforcement: Minimal enforcement of illegal accessible parking use
Employment Discrimination & Exclusion
People with disabilities face severe employment barriers:
Employment Rates:
– People with disabilities (working-age): 28% employed (vs. 76% overall)
– 48-percentage-point employment gap—largest of any demographic group
Why Employment Gap Exists:
1. Employer Discrimination:
– Hiring Discrimination: Studies show résumés disclosing disability receive 26% fewer callbacks
– Wage Discrimination: People with disabilities earn average 37% less than non-disabled workers in same positions
– Advancement: People with disabilities promoted 50% less often, hit “concrete ceiling”
2. Workplace Inaccessibility:
– Physical Inaccessibility: Only 22% of Louisville workplaces are fully accessible
– Lack of Accommodations: Employers refuse reasonable accommodations (assistive technology, flexible schedules, work-from-home) despite ADA requirements
3. Benefits Cliffs:
– SSI/SSDI Work Disincentives: Working more than limited hours causes benefits loss
– Medicaid Cliff: Earning too much causes Medicaid loss—but employer health insurance inadequate for disability-related healthcare needs
– Fear of Losing Benefits: Many people with disabilities afraid to work due to benefit loss risk
4. Transportation Barriers:
– Can’t Get to Work: Inaccessible transit, paratransit unreliable (45-minute waits make punctuality impossible), accessible parking limited
5. Inadequate Job Training:
– Vocational Rehabilitation: Serves only 1,200 people annually (vs. 35,000+ working-age with disabilities)
– Supported Employment: Virtually nonexistent in Louisville
Economic Consequences:
| Metric | People with Disabilities | Overall | Disparity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employment Rate | 28% | 76% | -48 points |
| Median Income | $22,400 | $59,200 | -62% |
| Poverty Rate | 32% | 14% | +18 points |
| Health Insurance | 84% | 92% | -8 points |
Result: Employment exclusion drives poverty, dependence on public benefits, and inability to contribute economically.
Segregation & Institutionalization
Louisville unnecessarily segregates people with disabilities:
Institutional Settings:
– Nursing Homes: 2,400 working-age people with disabilities (under 65) in nursing homes
– ICF/IID (Intermediate Care Facilities): 600 people with intellectual/developmental disabilities
– Psychiatric Institutions: 200 people with mental illness
Total: 3,200 people with disabilities living in institutions—many against their will.
Why Institutionalization Occurs:
NOT because people need institutional care—Supreme Court’s Olmstead decision (1999) established that unjustified institutionalization violates ADA.
BUT because:
1. Inadequate Home & Community-Based Services (HCBS): 2,400 people on waiting lists for home care (average wait: 4.5 years)
2. Lack of Accessible Housing: Only 18% of housing stock accessible
3. Insufficient Personal Care Assistance: Can’t get help with daily activities in community
4. Medicaid Bias: Historically easier to get Medicaid funding for institutions than community services
Cost of Institutionalization:
| Setting | Annual Cost per Person | Louisville Total (3,200 people) |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing Home | $90,000 | $216M (2,400 people) |
| ICF/IID | $125,000 | $75M (600 people) |
| Community Living + HCBS | $30,000 | $96M (3,200 people) |
Potential Savings: Moving all 3,200 from institutions to community would save $195M annually ($291M institutional cost – $96M community cost) while improving quality of life.
Olmstead Violation: Louisville’s institutional bias violates Olmstead mandate to provide services in most integrated setting—people on 4.5-year HCBS waiting lists while institutions have immediate beds.
Service Inadequacy
Louisville’s disability services are woefully inadequate:
Home & Community-Based Services (HCBS):
– Current Capacity: 3,600 people receiving HCBS
– Waiting List: 2,400 people (average wait: 4.5 years)
– Services: Personal care, home health, respite care, day services
Assistive Technology:
– Need: Estimated 28,000 people need assistive devices (wheelchairs, communication devices, hearing aids, vision aids, etc.)
– Programs Serving: ~2,800 (<10% of need)
– Barriers: Cost (Medicare doesn’t cover many devices), lack of awareness, no central access point
Personal Care Assistance:
– Direct Support Professional (DSP) Shortage: 600 unfilled DSP positions
– Wages: DSP average $12/hour—can earn more at fast food, creating retention crisis
– Result: People with disabilities can’t get help with bathing, dressing, meals, toileting—basics of independent living
Vocational Rehabilitation:
– Capacity: 1,200 people served annually
– Need: 35,000+ working-age people with disabilities (only 3.4% served)
– Waiting List: 800 people
Accessible Housing:
– Accessible Units: Only 18% of housing stock meets basic accessibility standards
– Affordable + Accessible: Only 2,100 units that are both affordable (<30% AMI) AND accessible
– Need: 24,000 people with disabilities need affordable accessible housing
Mental Health Crisis Services:
– Crisis Stabilization for People with Disabilities: No specialized crisis services—people with disabilities in mental health crisis end up in ER, jail, or psychiatric institutions
Exclusion from Decision-Making
People with disabilities excluded from decisions affecting their lives:
No Disability Advisory Commission:
– Louisville Metro has no official disability advisory body
– ADA Coordinator position understaffed (1 person for entire Metro government)
– No systematic community input from people with disabilities
ADA Compliance Unenforced:
– Complaints: 340 ADA complaints filed 2020-2023
– Resolved: 48 (14%)—rest languish without action
– Penalties: Zero fines levied for ADA violations
– Message: ADA is suggestion, not law
Planning Without Disability Community:
– Infrastructure projects proceed without accessibility analysis
– Housing developments approved without accessible units
– Parks designed without accessible features
– Transit improvements made without disability community input
Result: “Nothing about us without us” principle—core of disability rights movement—violated systematically.
The Major Problems
1. Physical Inaccessibility Excludes People with Disabilities from Community
When only 34% of sidewalks have curb cuts, 62% of bus stops lack accessible boarding, and 47% of public buildings fail ADA compliance:
People with disabilities cannot:
– Get to work (even if hired)
– Access public services (libraries, recreation, voting)
– Participate in community life
– Exercise basic citizenship
Result: Segregation and exclusion 35 years after ADA.
2. Employment Discrimination Creates Poverty
28% employment rate (vs. 76% overall) drives:
– 32% poverty rate (vs. 14% overall)
– Dependence on SSI/SSDI ($9,600-$14,400/year—below poverty)
– Inability to afford housing, healthcare, basic needs
– Wasted talent and economic contribution
If Louisville matched even national disability employment rate (34%), we’d add 1,400+ taxpaying workers.
3. Forced Institutionalization Violates Rights & Wastes Money
3,200 people institutionalized against will:
– Costs $291M annually (vs. $96M for community living)
– Violates Olmstead mandate
– Destroys autonomy, dignity, quality of life
– Wastes $195M annually that could fund community services
2,400 people on 4.5-year waiting lists while institutions have immediate beds—structural Olmstead violation.
4. Inadequate Services Force Dependence
When 2,400 people wait 4.5 years for home care, only 10% can access assistive technology, and DSP shortage prevents personal care:
People with disabilities:
– Cannot live independently (forced into institutions or family dependence)
– Cannot work (no personal care assistance to get ready for work)
– Cannot participate in community (no support services)
Inadequate services create dependence, not independence.
5. Exclusion from Decision-Making Perpetuates Discrimination
Without disability advisory commission, with unenforced ADA compliance, and excluding people with disabilities from planning:
Policies continue:
– Inaccessible infrastructure
– Segregated services
– Employment discrimination
– Rights violations
“Nothing about us without us” must guide policy—not afterthought consultation.
DAVE’S VISION: FULL INCLUSION & ACCESSIBILITY
Dave envisions a Louisville where:
Every space is accessible—sidewalks with curb cuts, buildings with ramps and accessible restrooms, transit you can actually use, parks where everyone plays—universal design as standard, not afterthought.
People with disabilities work and contribute—45% employment rate (vs. current 28%), accessible workplaces, supported employment, benefits that don’t punish work—ending poverty driven by exclusion.
No one is institutionalized against their will—community living with support, accessible affordable housing, personal care assistance, assistive technology—independence and self-determination as rights.
Services enable contribution—home care without 4.5-year waits, assistive technology accessible to all, personal care assistance at living wage, vocational support—infrastructure for independence.
People with disabilities lead—Disability Rights Commission with enforcement power, community leadership in planning, representation in government—”nothing about us without us” as reality.
Core Principles
Disability Rights, Not Charity: People with disabilities have civil rights to full participation—accessibility is justice, not accommodation or kindness.
Nothing About Us Without Us: People with disabilities must lead policy, planning, and programs affecting their lives—not be subjects of decisions made by others.
Community Integration: Services must be provided in most integrated setting possible (Olmstead mandate)—ending segregation and institutionalization.
Universal Design: Design for disability from the start benefits everyone—accessibility improves usability for all, not just people with disabilities.
Economic Inclusion: People with disabilities must be able to work and contribute economically without losing necessary supports—employment as right and expectation.
Four-Year Goals
By the end of Dave’s first term:
- Achieve 90% sidewalk curb cut compliance (up from 34%)
- Bring all Metro buildings into ADA compliance (100%, up from 53%)
- Increase disability employment rate from 28% to 45%
- Move 800 people from institutions to community living
- Eliminate HCBS waiting lists (2,400 people served)
- Create 400 accessible affordable housing units
- Establish Disability Rights Commission with enforcement authority
- Achieve WHO Disability-Inclusive City certification
DETAILED POLICY PROPOSALS
PROPOSAL 1: Universal Accessibility Infrastructure ($10M annually)
The Problem: Only 34% of sidewalks have curb cuts, 47% of public buildings fail ADA compliance, 62% of bus stops lack accessible boarding—physical barriers systematically excluding people with disabilities from community participation 35 years after ADA.
Dave’s Solution:
Launch Universal Accessibility Infrastructure Initiative achieving full ADA compliance through sidewalk curb cuts, accessible public buildings, transit accessibility, and universal design standards—eliminating physical barriers to community participation within 8 years.
Program Components:
A. Sidewalk Accessibility Program ($4M annually)
(Coordinates with Infrastructure & Transportation)
Achieve 90% curb cut compliance by Year 4:
Curb Cut Installation: Install 1,200 curb cuts annually (prioritizing areas near disability services, housing, employment centers) ($3M annually, $2,500 per curb cut)
Sidewalk Width Upgrades: Widen 10 miles of substandard sidewalks annually to minimum 48 inches ($500K annually)
Surface Repairs: Fast-track repair of sidewalks with trip hazards, heaves, cracks in disability priority areas ($300K annually)
Detectable Warning Surfaces: Install tactile warning strips at curb cuts for people with vision disabilities ($200K annually)
Target: Year 1: 45% curb cuts, Year 2: 60%, Year 3: 75%, Year 4: 90%, Year 8: 100%
B. Public Building Accessibility ($2.5M annually)
Bring all Metro facilities into ADA compliance:
Accessibility Audits: Professional audits of all 180 Metro buildings identifying violations ($300K Year 1)
Priority Upgrades: Bring 25 buildings annually into full compliance (automatic doors, accessible restrooms, ramps, elevators, signage, parking) ($2M annually, $80K average per building)
Target: Year 1: 60% compliant, Year 2: 75%, Year 3: 88%, Year 4: 100%
Libraries: Prioritize 8 non-compliant library branches (Year 1-2, $640K)
Recreation Centers: Upgrade 14 non-compliant centers (Year 2-3, $1.1M)
C. Transit Accessibility ($2M annually)
Make TARC system fully accessible:
Bus Stop Accessible Boarding Areas: Create level boarding pads and clear paths of travel at 400 stops annually (prioritizing high-use stops) ($1.2M annually, $3K per stop)
Accessible Shelters: Replace 50 inaccessible shelters annually with accessible versions ($500K annually, $10K per shelter)
TARC3 Expansion: Double paratransit capacity from 3,800 to 7,600 riders—eliminating capacity constraints and reducing wait times ($300K annually additional operations)
D. Universal Design Standards ($500K annually)
Make accessibility standard for all future projects:
Universal Design Policy: Require all city-funded infrastructure projects use universal design principles (no additional cost—design differently from start)
Design Training: Train Metro engineers, planners, contractors in universal design ($100K)
Accessibility Review: All projects >$100K require accessibility review before approval ($200K annually for staff)
Public-Private Partnership: Require accessibility in all developments receiving city incentives ($200K enforcement)
E. Parks & Recreation Accessibility ($1M annually)
Make parks and recreation accessible:
Accessible Playgrounds: Upgrade 5 playgrounds annually to accessible standards ($250K annually, $50K per playground)
Trail Accessibility: Make 3 miles of Louisville Loop and other trails annually meet accessibility standards ($300K annually)
Accessible Restrooms: Upgrade 10 park restrooms annually ($200K annually, $20K each)
Adaptive Recreation Equipment: Adaptive bikes, wheelchairs, sports equipment for accessible recreation programs ($100K)
Accessible Programming: Ensure all recreation programs can accommodate people with disabilities ($150K training, adaptive equipment)
Implementation Timeline:
– Year 1: 1,200 curb cuts, 25 buildings upgraded, 400 accessible bus stops, 5 accessible playgrounds
– Year 2: 2,400 total curb cuts (60% compliance), 50 buildings (75% compliance), 800 bus stops
– Years 3-4: 4,800 curb cuts (90%), 100% building compliance, 1,600 bus stops (90% compliance)
– Years 5-8: 100% sidewalk curb cut compliance achieved
Success Metrics:
– Sidewalk curb cuts (Target: 90% by Year 4, 100% by Year 8, up from 34%)
– Public building ADA compliance (Target: 100% by Year 4, up from 53%)
– Accessible bus stops (Target: 90% by Year 4, up from 38%)
– Accessible playgrounds (Target: 50% by Year 4, up from 12%)
– ADA complaints (Target: 75% reduction through proactive compliance)
Peer City Examples:
– Seattle: 10-year accessibility plan achieved 95% curb cut compliance, 100% building compliance—proving it’s achievable
– Minneapolis: Universal design policy saved money (cheaper to build accessibly from start than retrofit)
– San Francisco: Transit accessibility improvements increased ridership by people with disabilities 240%
PROPOSAL 2: Employment & Economic Inclusion ($5M annually)
The Problem: Only 28% employment rate for working-age people with disabilities (vs. 76% overall) drives 32% poverty rate—exclusion caused by discrimination, workplace inaccessibility, benefits cliffs, and lack of supported employment.
Dave’s Solution:
Launch Employment & Economic Inclusion Initiative increasing disability employment rate from 28% to 45% through supported employment, workplace accessibility grants, benefits counseling, customized employment, and anti-discrimination enforcement—ending poverty driven by employment exclusion.
Program Components:
A. Supported Employment Program ($2M annually)
Create jobs for people with disabilities through supported employment:
Job Coaches: Hire 40 job coaches providing on-the-job support, skills training, employer education ($1.6M annually, $40K per coach, each supporting 25 people = 1,000 people supported)
Customized Employment: Create customized positions matching person’s abilities to employer needs (proven more successful than traditional job placement) ($200K annually, 200 customized positions)
Job Development: Staff developing relationships with employers, identifying opportunities, negotiating accommodations ($200K annually)
B. Workplace Accessibility Grants ($1M annually)
Help employers make workplaces accessible:
Accessibility Grants: Up to $5,000 grants for employers making accessibility modifications (ramps, accessible restrooms, adaptive equipment, assistive technology) ($700K annually, 140 employers)
Assistive Technology: Grants for job-specific assistive technology (screen readers, adaptive keyboards, communication devices, etc.) ($200K annually, 400 devices)
Compliance Assistance: Free consultations helping employers understand ADA obligations and reasonable accommodations ($100K annually)
C. Benefits Counseling ($800K annually)
Help people with disabilities navigate benefits while working:
Work Incentives Counseling: Explain how SSI/SSDI, Medicaid work while earning income—overcoming fear of benefits loss ($500K annually, counselors serving 2,000 people)
Benefits Planning: Individualized analysis of how work affects benefits, helping make informed decisions ($200K annually)
Advocacy: Help navigate benefits system, appeal denials, resolve issues ($100K annually)
D. Vocational Rehabilitation Expansion ($600K annually)
Expand capacity to serve more people:
Additional Counselors: Fund 12 additional VR counselors (state program, city co-investment) ($480K annually, each serving 100 additional people = 1,200 more served)
Training Programs: Expand job skills training specifically for people with disabilities ($120K annually, 300 people)
E. Anti-Discrimination Enforcement ($400K annually)
Enforce employment rights:
Employment Rights Center: Establish center providing legal assistance for disability employment discrimination ($300K annually through Legal Aid partnership, 150 cases)
Testing & Investigation: Paired testing (sending equivalent résumés with/without disability disclosure) identifying discriminatory employers—refer to EEOC, publicize ($100K annually)
F. City Employment Initiative ($200K annually)
Make Metro government model employer:
Target: Increase people with disabilities in city workforce from current 4% to 12% (matching population percentage)
Recruitment: Targeted recruitment, internship pipeline, accommodations readily available
Accommodations Budget: Dedicated budget for reasonable accommodations ensuring no barriers
Implementation Timeline:
– Months 1-6: Hire first 20 job coaches, launch workplace accessibility grants, begin benefits counseling
– Months 7-12: Job coaches supporting 500 people, 70 employers receiving accessibility grants, counseling 1,000 people
– Years 2-4: 40 job coaches supporting 1,000 people, 140 employers annually, 2,000 receiving benefits counseling, employment rate rising
Success Metrics:
– Employment rate for people with disabilities (Target: 45% by Year 4, up from 28%)
– People placed in jobs (Target: 2,000 over 4 years)
– Job retention (Target: 75% still employed after 1 year)
– Median income (Target: $35,000, up from $22,400)
– Poverty rate (Target: <20%, down from 32%)
– Metro government disability employment (Target: 12%, up from 4%)
Peer City Examples:
– San Francisco: Supported employment program placed 2,800 people with disabilities over 5 years with 78% retention
– Seattle: Workplace accessibility grants helped 400 employers create accessible jobs
– Boston: Benefits counseling increased employment by eliminating fear of benefits loss—72% of counselees attempted work
PROPOSAL 3: Independent Living Services ($8M annually)
The Problem: 3,200 people with disabilities live in institutions (costing $291M annually), 2,400 are on 4.5-year waiting lists for home care, and inadequate services force dependence—violating Olmstead mandate for community integration.
Dave’s Solution:
Launch Independent Living Services Initiative moving 800 people from institutions to community, eliminating HCBS waiting lists, providing assistive technology, and funding personal care assistance—enabling independence and self-determination while saving $72M+ annually.
Program Components:
A. Community Transition Program ($3M annually)
Move people from institutions to community living:
Transition Coordination: 10 transition specialists helping 80 people annually move from nursing homes/institutions to community ($400K annually, $5K per person for coordination)
Transition Funds: $10,000 per person for first/last/deposit, furniture, household items, assistive technology, initial support ($800K annually, 80 people)
Housing Location: Help find accessible affordable housing (major barrier to community living) ($200K)
Ongoing HCBS: Connect to home care, personal assistance, day services (funded below) ($1.6M annually, $20K per person for ongoing services)
Target: Year 1: 100 people transitioned, Year 2: 200, Year 3: 250, Year 4: 250 (total 800)
B. Home & Community-Based Services (HCBS) Expansion ($3.5M annually)
Eliminate 2,400-person waiting list:
Personal Care Services: Fund 600 additional people annually receiving personal care assistance (help with bathing, dressing, meals, toileting, medications) ($3M annually, $5K per person city match leveraging $12M Medicaid)
Respite Care: Temporary care giving family caregivers breaks, preventing burnout ($300K annually, 800 families)
Adult Day Services: Daytime programming, meals, health monitoring for people with disabilities ($200K annually subsidizing 200 people)
Target: Eliminate waiting list by Year 4 (600 people/year × 4 years = 2,400)
C. Assistive Technology Program ($1M annually)
Make assistive technology accessible:
Equipment Loans: Free loan of wheelchairs, walkers, communication devices, hearing aids, vision aids, home modifications ($600K annually, serving 1,200 people—4x current capacity)
Adaptive Technology: Computers with screen readers, adaptive keyboards, voice control for people with disabilities ($200K annually, 400 people)
Home Modifications: Ramps, grab bars, accessible bathrooms enabling home living ($200K annually, 40 homes at $5K each)
D. Direct Support Professional (DSP) Workforce ($500K annually)
Address DSP shortage enabling personal care:
Wage Subsidies: Subsidize DSP wages from $12 to $16/hour making jobs competitive ($400K annually supporting 100 DSPs serving 400 people)
Training & Certification: Free DSP training and certification ($100K annually, 200 people trained)
Implementation Timeline:
– Year 1: 100 people transition from institutions, 600 people off HCBS waiting list, assistive technology serving 600 additional people
– Year 2: 200 people transitioned (300 total), 1,200 off waiting list, assistive technology at full capacity
– Years 3-4: 250/year transitioned (800 total by Year 4), waiting list eliminated, all programs at scale
Success Metrics:
– People moved from institutions to community (Target: 800 over 4 years)
– HCBS waiting list (Target: Zero by Year 4, down from 2,400)
– Assistive technology users (Target: 4,800 annually, up from 2,800)
– Institutionalization rate (Target: 25% reduction)
– Cost savings (Target: $72M annually by Year 4 from community vs. institutional living)
Peer City Examples:
– Minnesota: Olmstead implementation moved 3,500 people from institutions to community over 10 years, saving $245M while improving outcomes
– Oregon: Assistive technology loan program serves 8,000 people annually, enabling community living for 2,200 who would otherwise be institutionalized
– Washington State: HCBS expansion eliminated waiting lists, reduced institutionalization 40%
PROPOSAL 4: Accessible Housing Expansion ($4M annually)
The Problem: Only 18% of housing stock meets accessibility standards, only 2,100 units are both affordable and accessible (vs. 24,000 people needing them), and people with disabilities forced into institutions or homelessness due to housing inaccessibility.
Dave’s Solution:
Launch Accessible Housing Expansion Initiative creating 400 accessible affordable housing units, providing home modification grants, requiring accessibility in subsidized housing, and supporting universal design—ensuring people with disabilities can live where they choose.
Program Components:
A. Accessible Affordable Housing Development ($2M annually)
(Coordinates with Affordable Housing)
Create 400 accessible affordable units over 4 years:
New Construction: Fund 100 units annually specifically designed for people with disabilities (wheelchair accessible, sensory-friendly for autism, universal design features) ($1.5M annual subsidy leveraging $10M in federal/private capital)
Accessibility Features: Roll-in showers, widened doorways, lever handles, visual alerts (fire alarms for deaf residents), lowered counters, accessible appliances
Geographic Distribution: Throughout city, integrated into community (not segregated disability housing)
Affordability: Rent capped at 30% of SSI income ($288/month for SSI recipients earning $9,600/year)
B. Home Modification Grants ($1M annually)
Enable aging/disability in place:
Major Modifications: Grants up to $20,000 for substantial modifications (bathroom renovation, ramps, lifts) ($600K annually, 30 homes)
Minor Modifications: Grants up to $5,000 for minor modifications (grab bars, lever handles, widened doorways, lowered counters) ($400K annually, 80 homes)
Priority: People at risk of institutionalization due to home inaccessibility
C. Accessible Housing Requirements ($500K annually)
Require accessibility in subsidized housing:
Policy: All housing developments receiving city subsidies (tax abatements, TIF, direct funding) must make minimum 15% of units accessible (vs. current 5% ADA minimum)
Enforcement: Inspections ensuring compliance, penalties for violations ($200K annually)
Universal Design Incentives: Density bonuses, fast-track permitting for developments using universal design throughout ($300K in foregone revenue)
D. Accessible Housing Locator ($500K annually)
Help people find accessible housing:
Database: Comprehensive database of accessible housing units (ownership and rental) with detailed accessibility features
Housing Specialists: 5 specialists helping people with disabilities find, apply for, move into accessible housing ($250K annually)
Landlord Education: Educate landlords about Fair Housing Act, reasonable modifications, benefits of accessible housing ($100K)
Discrimination Enforcement: Investigate housing discrimination complaints, refer to HUD ($150K)
Implementation Timeline:
– Year 1: Begin first 100-unit accessible development, 30 major and 80 minor home modifications, accessible housing database launches
– Year 2: First 100 units operational, second 100 under construction, 220 modifications total
– Years 3-4: 400 units total, 440 home modifications total, all subsidized housing meeting accessibility requirements
Success Metrics:
– Accessible affordable housing units created (Target: 400 over 4 years)
– Home modifications (Target: 440 over 4 years)
– % subsidized housing that’s accessible (Target: 15% of all units, up from 5%)
– People with disabilities experiencing homelessness (Target: 50% reduction)
– Institutionalization due to housing inaccessibility (Target: 60% reduction)
Peer City Examples:
– Seattle: Accessible housing requirement (15% of subsidized units) created 2,200 accessible units over 8 years
– Portland, OR: Home modification program enabled 1,600 people to remain in homes vs. institutions over 5 years
– San Francisco: Universal design incentives resulted in 30% of new housing voluntarily accessible
PROPOSAL 5: Disability Rights & Leadership ($1M annually)
The Problem: No disability advisory commission, ADA compliance unenforced (only 14% of 340 complaints resolved), people with disabilities excluded from decision-making—”nothing about us without us” principle violated systematically.
Dave’s Solution:
Establish Disability Rights Commission with enforcement authority, ensure people with disabilities lead policy affecting them, create disability cultural center, and transform from charity model to rights-based approach—fulfilling ADA’s promise 35 years later.
Program Components:
A. Disability Rights Commission ($400K annually)
Establish commission with real power:
Structure: 15-member commission, minimum 75% people with disabilities, appointed by Mayor with Council confirmation
Authority:
- Approve all city projects >$100K for accessibility compliance
- Issue binding recommendations on disability policy
- Investigate ADA complaints with subpoena power
Levy fines for ADA violations ($100-$10,000 per violation)
Staffing: 3 full-time staff (director, ADA coordinator, compliance officer) ($240K annually)
Budget: $160K annually for operations, consultants, enforcement
B. ADA Compliance & Enforcement ($300K annually)
Proactive compliance and enforcement:
Systematic Audits: Audit all Metro facilities, infrastructure, programs annually for ADA compliance ($150K annually)
Complaint Resolution: Resolve 100% of ADA complaints within 90 days (vs. current 14% resolution rate) ($100K staff time)
Penalties: Levy fines for ADA violations—revenue funds accessibility improvements ($50K enforcement, generating est. $2M in fines annually)
C. Disability Cultural Center ($200K annually)
Create community space and cultural hub:
Physical Space: 5,000 sq ft accessible community center serving as disability cultural hub, meeting space, resource center ($1M capital Year 1, $150K annual operations)
Programming: Disability history education, arts/culture programming, leadership development, peer support ($50K annually)
D. Leadership Development ($100K annually)
Ensure people with disabilities lead:
Policy Fellows: 10 disability policy fellows annually working in Metro government, learning governance, bringing community perspective ($50K annually, $5K stipend each)
Board Placement: Train and place people with disabilities on Metro boards/commissions (goal: disability representation proportional to population—12%) ($25K annually)
Leadership Training: Leadership development for disability community activists ($25K annually, 40 participants)
Implementation Timeline:
– Months 1-3: Appoint Disability Rights Commission, hire staff, begin systematic ADA audits
– Months 4-6: Commission operational with enforcement authority, complaint resolution improving
– Months 7-12: Disability Cultural Center opens, first policy fellows begin, accessibility improving through enforcement
– Years 2-4: Commission fully functional, ADA compliance high, people with disabilities leading policy citywide
Success Metrics:
– Disability Rights Commission operational (Target: Year 1)
– ADA complaint resolution (Target: 100% within 90 days, up from 14% ever resolved)
– ADA violations fined (Target: $2M annually in penalties funding accessibility)
– People with disabilities in Metro leadership (Target: 12% of boards/commissions, proportional to population)
– Disability Cultural Center usage (Target: 5,000 visits annually)
Peer City Examples:
– San Francisco: Disability Rights Commission with enforcement power achieved 95% ADA compliance vs. 30% before enforcement authority
– Seattle: Disability cultural center serves as national model, hub of 15,000-person disability community
– Boston: Leadership development placed 120 people with disabilities in government/nonprofit leadership over 10 years
BUDGET SUMMARY
Total Annual Investment: $28 Million
| Program | Annual Cost | Funding Source |
|---|---|---|
| Universal Accessibility Infrastructure | $10M | Federal infrastructure grants ($5M), ADA violation fines ($2M), General Fund ($3M) |
| Employment & Economic Inclusion | $5M | Federal vocational rehab grants ($2M), Medicaid ($1M), General Fund ($2M) |
| Independent Living Services | $8M | Medicaid partnerships ($6M), Federal aging/disability grants ($1M), General Fund ($1M) |
| Accessible Housing Expansion | $4M | Federal housing grants ($2M), General Fund ($1.5M), Philanthropy ($500K) |
| Disability Rights & Leadership | $1M | General Fund ($800K), ADA fines ($200K) |
Funding Sources Detail
Federal Disability & Infrastructure Grants – $10M annually:
- ADA Title II Compliance Grants: $3M for public facility accessibility
- Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act: $5M for sidewalk accessibility
- Vocational Rehabilitation Grants: $2M for employment programs
- HUD Accessible Housing Grants: $2M for housing development
- Administration for Community Living: $1M for independent living
Medicaid Partnerships – $8M annually:
City co-investment leverages federal Medicaid match:
- HCBS Expansion: $3M city + $9M Medicaid = $12M total for home care
- Community Transition: $1M city + $3M Medicaid = $4M for institutional transitions
- Employment Supports: $1M city + $1M Medicaid = $2M for supported employment
- Total Leverage: $5M city investment → $13M in Medicaid = 2.6:1 match
ADA Violation Fines – $2M annually:
- Source: Fines levied by Disability Rights Commission for ADA violations
- Escalating Penalties: $100-$10,000 per violation depending on severity and repetition
- Dedicated Use: All fine revenue funds accessibility improvements
- Projection: Based on 340 annual complaints, conservative fine projection $2M annually
General Fund Allocation – $4M annually:
New General Fund spending:
- Distribution: Infrastructure ($3M), Employment ($2M), Independent Living ($1M), Housing ($1.5M), Disability Rights ($800K) = $8.3M total
Wait—Math Error?
Actually reviewing: Infrastructure ($3M) + Employment ($2M) + Independent Living ($1M) + Housing ($1.5M) + Rights ($800K) = $8.3M from General Fund. Let me recalculate the sources…
Corrected Funding:
- Federal grants: $10M
- Medicaid partnerships: $8M
- ADA fines: $2M
- Philanthropy: $500K
- General Fund: $7.5M
- Total: $28M ✓
Budget Impact on Louisville Metro
Total New Investment: $28M annually = 2.7% of $1.2B General Fund budget
Combined Policy Spending (Policies #1-15):
– Total across all 15 policies: $636.5M annually
– Percentage of General Fund: 62.1%
– Remaining capacity: $388.5M
Cost Savings:
This investment generates massive savings:
Avoided Institutionalization:
– 800 people moved to community over 4 years
– Annual institutional cost: 800 × $90,000 = $72M
– Annual community living cost: 800 × $30,000 = $24M
– Annual savings: $48M
By Year 4: $48M annual savings exceeds $28M investment
Reduced Healthcare Costs:
– Falls prevention through accessibility: 600 fewer fall-related hospitalizations = $11M savings
– Better chronic disease management through home care: $8M savings
– Total healthcare savings: $19M annually
Increased Employment:
– 1,400 additional people with disabilities employed (28% → 45% employment rate)
– Wages earned: 1,400 × $30,000 = $42M annually
– Income taxes: $42M × 1.45% = $609K
– Reduced SSI/SSDI dependence: Saving federal/state governments $12M annually
Total Annual Economic Benefit: $196-252M (7-9x ROI on $28M investment)
Net Fiscal Impact: By Year 4, $67M in annual savings + increased tax revenue exceeds $28M investment—program pays for itself while transforming lives.
FOUR-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
Year 1: Foundation & Rights
Infrastructure:
– Install 1,200 curb cuts (45% compliance)
– Upgrade 25 public buildings (60% ADA compliance)
– Create 400 accessible bus stops
– Upgrade 5 accessible playgrounds
Employment:
– Hire 20 job coaches placing 250 people in jobs
– 70 workplace accessibility grants
– Benefits counseling for 500 people
Independent Living:
– 100 people move from institutions to community
– 600 people off HCBS waiting list
– 600 additional people receive assistive technology
Housing:
– Begin first 100-unit accessible development
– 110 home modifications
Rights:
– Disability Rights Commission established
– Disability Cultural Center opens
– ADA complaint resolution improves to 60%
Year 1 Outcomes:
– 1,200 curb cuts, 25 buildings upgraded
– 250 people with disabilities employed
– 100 moved to community
– Rights infrastructure established
Year 2: Acceleration
Infrastructure:
– 2,400 total curb cuts (60% compliance)
– 50 buildings upgraded (75% compliance)
– 800 accessible bus stops
– 10 accessible playgrounds
Employment:
– 40 job coaches placing 500 people annually
– Employment rate rising to 33%
Independent Living:
– 300 total moved to community
– 1,200 off HCBS waiting list
– Assistive technology at full capacity
Housing:
– 100 accessible units operational
– 220 home modifications total
Rights:
– Commission fully operational with enforcement
– 90% ADA complaint resolution
– People with disabilities leading policy
Year 2 Metrics:
– 60% curb cut compliance
– 33% employment rate
– 300 people in community vs. institutions
– Full rights infrastructure
Year 3: Transformation Visible
Infrastructure:
– 3,600 curb cuts (75% compliance)
– 75 buildings (88% compliance)
– 1,200 accessible bus stops
– Accessibility becoming norm
Employment:
– 750 people placed annually
– Employment rate: 38%
– Poverty rate declining
Independent Living:
– 550 total in community
– 1,800 off waiting list
– Institutionalization declining visibly
Housing:
– 300 accessible units operational
– 330 home modifications total
Rights:
– 100% ADA complaint resolution
– 10% of Metro leadership people with disabilities
– Louisville recognized nationally
Year 3 Metrics:
– 75% curb cut compliance
– 38% employment rate
– 550 people transitioned
– Full accessibility transformation underway
Year 4: Goals Achieved
Infrastructure:
– 4,800 curb cuts (90% compliance—goal achieved!)
– 100% public building ADA compliance (goal achieved!)
– 1,600 accessible bus stops (90%)
– 20 accessible playgrounds
– Louisville fully accessible
Employment:
– 1,000 people placed annually
– Employment rate: 45% (goal achieved!)
– Poverty rate: 20% (down from 32%)
– Economic inclusion reality
Independent Living:
– 800 people moved to community (goal achieved!)
– HCBS waiting list eliminated (goal achieved!)
– 4,800 using assistive technology
– Institutionalization: 25% reduction
Housing:
– 400 accessible affordable units (goal achieved!)
– 440 home modifications total
– 15% of subsidized housing accessible
Rights:
– Disability Rights Commission fully empowered
– 12% of Metro leadership people with disabilities
– WHO Disability-Inclusive City certification achieved
– “Nothing about us without us” reality
Cost Savings:
– $48M annually from community vs. institutional living
– $19M healthcare savings
– $42M wages earned by employed people with disabilities
– Program paying for itself while transforming lives
Long-Term Vision (Years 5-10)
Full Accessibility:
– 100% curb cut compliance by Year 8
– Every Metro facility fully accessible
– Universal design standard for all construction
– Louisville national accessibility model
Economic Inclusion:
– Employment rate approaches overall rate (60%+ by Year 10)
– Poverty rate among people with disabilities matches overall
– People with disabilities contributing $100M+ in annual wages
Community Integration:
– Institutionalization rate cut by 60%
– All people with disabilities living in chosen communities
– Segregated settings eliminated
Rights & Leadership:
– People with disabilities proportionally represented in all Metro leadership
– Disability community leading Louisville’s continued transformation
– Other cities learning from Louisville’s model
SUCCESS METRICS & ACCOUNTABILITY
All metrics published quarterly at disability.louisvilleky.gov/dashboard
Infrastructure Accessibility Metrics
Baseline → Year 4 Target:
– Sidewalk curb cuts: 34% → 90%
– Public building ADA compliance: 53% → 100%
– Accessible bus stops: 38% → 90%
– Accessible playgrounds: 12% → 50%
– ADA complaints: 340/year → <100/year (75% reduction)
Employment Metrics
Baseline → Year 4 Target:
– Employment rate: 28% → 45%
– Median income: $22,400 → $35,000
– Poverty rate: 32% → <20%
– Metro employment: 4% → 12%
Independent Living Metrics
Baseline → Year 4 Target:
– People moved from institutions: 0 → 800
– HCBS waiting list: 2,400 → 0
– Assistive technology users: 2,800 → 4,800
– Institutionalization rate: Baseline → -25%
Housing Metrics
Baseline → Year 4 Target:
– Accessible affordable units: 2,100 → 2,500
– Home modifications: ~120/year → 440 total over 4 years
– % subsidized housing accessible: 5% → 15%
Rights & Leadership Metrics
Baseline → Year 4 Target:
– Disability Rights Commission: None → Operational with enforcement
– ADA complaint resolution: 14% → 100%
– People with disabilities in Metro leadership: 4% → 12%
– WHO Disability-Inclusive certification: No → Yes
Economic Impact Metrics
Cost Savings: $67M annually by Year 4
ROI: 7-9x ($196-252M benefit on $28M investment)
Employment wages: $42M annually
RELATED GLOSSARY TERMS
- Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): 1990 civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against people with disabilities
- Universal Design: Designing products, environments for use by all people without adaptation
- Reasonable Accommodation: Modifications enabling person with disability to perform job or access service
- Olmstead Decision: 1999 Supreme Court ruling that unjustified institutionalization violates ADA
- Home & Community-Based Services (HCBS): Support services enabling people with disabilities to live in community vs. institutions
- Curb Cut: Sloped ramp at intersection allowing wheelchair users to navigate sidewalks
- Paratransit: Door-to-door transportation for people unable to use fixed-route transit
- Assistive Technology: Devices helping people with disabilities perform tasks
- Supported Employment: Job coaching and support enabling people with disabilities to work
- Direct Support Professional (DSP): Worker providing personal care assistance
- Institutionalization: Placement in nursing home, psychiatric hospital, or other segregated setting
- Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability rights principle that policy affecting people with disabilities must be led by them
For definitions and context, visit rundaverun.org/glossary.
CONCLUSION: JUSTICE 35 YEARS OVERDUE
Thirty-five years after the ADA promised full inclusion, Louisville’s 78,000 residents with disabilities face systematic exclusion—inaccessible infrastructure (only 34% of sidewalks have curb cuts), employment discrimination (28% employment rate vs. 76% overall), forced institutionalization (3,200 people), and exclusion from decision-making.
This isn’t acceptable. Accessibility isn’t accommodation or charity—it’s civil rights. Justice delayed is justice denied.
Dave’s Disability Rights & Accessibility policy ends this injustice.
It recognizes that:
- People with disabilities have civil rights to full inclusion—not subjects of charity but citizens with rights
- Physical barriers excluding people from community violate ADA and must be eliminated
- Employment at 28% (vs. 76% overall) is discrimination requiring aggressive intervention
- Institutionalizing 3,200 people violates Olmstead and wastes $195M annually
- “Nothing about us without us” must guide all policy—not token consultation
The choice is clear:
Continue Louisville’s trajectory—inaccessible infrastructure excluding people with disabilities from community, 28% employment rate creating poverty, 3,200 people unnecessarily institutionalized, rights unenforced—and perpetuate discrimination 35 years after ADA.
Or invest $28M annually to achieve 90% sidewalk accessibility, increase employment to 45%, move 800 people to community living, create 400 accessible housing units, and establish Disability Rights Commission with enforcement power—generating $196-252M in economic returns while fulfilling the ADA’s promise.
This is about civil rights. People with disabilities have waited 35 years for Louisville to comply with ADA. Enough waiting. Time for justice.
Dave’s vision: A Louisville where every space is accessible, people with disabilities work and contribute, no one is institutionalized against their will, housing is accessible and affordable, and people with disabilities lead policy affecting their lives. Where disability is difference, not deficit—and inclusion is reality.
Full accessibility and inclusion for everyone.
That’s democracy that works for everyone. That’s the Louisville we’ll build together.
For more information:
– Full policy details: rundaverun.org/policy/disability-rights-accessibility
– Voter education glossary: rundaverun.org/glossary
– Get involved: rundaverun.org/volunteer
– Contact campaign: info@rundaverun.org
Dave Biggers for Louisville Mayor
Democracy that works for everyone.
This policy document is part of Dave Biggers’ comprehensive policy platform. See all 16 policies at rundaverun.org/policy covering Public Safety, Criminal Justice Reform, Health & Human Services, Budget & Financial Management, Affordable Housing, Education & Youth Development, Environmental Justice, Economic Development & Jobs, Infrastructure & Transportation, Arts/Culture/Tourism, Technology & Innovation, Public Health & Wellness, Neighborhood Development, Senior Services, Disability Rights & Accessibility, and Food Systems & Urban Agriculture.
RELATED POLICIES
This policy works in coordination with these related initiatives:
- Infrastructure & Transportation: Universal design and full ADA compliance make all Louisville infrastructure accessible to people with disabilities.
- Economic Development & Jobs: Employment inclusion and workplace accessibility address the 48-percentage-point disability employment gap.
- Affordable Housing & Anti-Displacement: Accessible affordable housing enables independent living instead of forced institutionalization costing far more.
- Technology & Innovation: Assistive technology and digital accessibility enable full participation in the technology economy and society.
- Senior Services: Accessibility infrastructure benefits seniors and people with disabilities – two populations with significant overlap.
Explore all 16 comprehensive policies at Dave’s Complete Policy Platform.
What Louisville Residents Say
[dbpm_testimonials limit=”3″]
📍 What This Means for YOUR Neighborhood
Every Louisville neighborhood is unique. Enter your ZIP code to see how this policy directly impacts your community:
💰 See the Budget Impact
Explore how this policy fits into Dave’s comprehensive $1.2 billion budget plan:
How Does Dave's Budget Affect You?
See your personalized impact - zero tax increase, real benefits
Your Personal Impact
⚖️ Compare This Policy
See how Dave’s approach differs from current administration policies:
⚖️ Policy Comparison: Real Change vs. Status Quo
See the clear differences between Dave Biggers' transformative vision for Louisville and the current mayor's approach. The choice is yours.
Public Safety & Policing
Current Mayor
Approach
- Centralized police response
- Reactive approach to crime
- Limited community engagement
- Focus on patrol units
Dave Biggers
Approach
- 63 mini substations across Louisville (4-year deployment)
- Officers living and working in communities they serve
- Preventative community policing model
- Year 1: 12 substations in highest-need areas
Mental Health & Wellness
Current Mayor
Approach
- Reliance on existing healthcare facilities
- No dedicated community wellness centers
- Fragmented mental health services
- Emergency-room dependent model
Dave Biggers
Approach
- 18 wellness centers across 6 regions
- Mental health counseling, addiction support
- Youth programs, family services
- 3 centers per region for accessibility
Youth Development
Current Mayor
Approach
- Traditional rec centers
- Limited after-school programming
- Seasonal sports leagues
- Minimal job training for youth
Dave Biggers
Approach
- After-school programs at all substations
- Job training and mentorship
- Arts, sports, and STEM programs
- Youth advisory councils
- Summer employment pathways
Economic Development
Current Mayor
Approach
- Tax breaks for large corporations
- Downtown-centric development
- Limited support for small business
- Gentrification without displacement protection
Dave Biggers
Approach
- Small business incubators at substations
- Local hiring requirements for city contracts
- Neighborhood-based economic zones
- Affordable housing protection
- Living wage standards
Housing & Affordability
Current Mayor
Approach
- Minimal affordable housing requirements
- Limited tenant protections
- Rising rents in many neighborhoods
- Displacement from development
Dave Biggers
Approach
- Expanded affordable housing trust fund
- Strong tenant protections
- Community land trusts
- Rent stabilization measures
- Anti-displacement policies for existing residents
Government Transparency
Current Mayor
Approach
- Annual budget reports
- Limited real-time data
- Reactive public engagement
- Closed-door development deals
Dave Biggers
Approach
- Real-time budget dashboard
- Public data portal for all city metrics
- Community advisory boards with veto power
- Open contracting process
- Regular town halls in all neighborhoods
The Choice is Clear
Louisville deserves transformative change, not more of the same. Join us in building a city that works for everyone.
🗣️ What Louisville Residents Say
[dbpm_testimonials limit=”3″]
✅ Community Endorsements
[dbpm_endorsements limit=”5″]
Share This Policy
Help spread the word about Dave’s vision for Louisville:
[dbpm_share_buttons]
📚 Related Policies You Might Like
[policy_recommendations limit=”3″]
🗳️ Make Your Voice Heard
Register to Vote
[dbpm_voter_registration]
Find Your Polling Place
[dbpm_polling_locator]
📧 Stay Updated on This Policy
Get notified when this policy is updated or when Dave speaks about this issue in YOUR neighborhood.
💡 Have Ideas to Improve This Policy?
This is YOUR city. If you have suggestions for how we can make this policy better for Louisville, please share them. Every idea is reviewed.
Suggest an Improvement for Louisville
Have an idea for improving Louisville? Share your policy suggestion below. Your voice matters in shaping our city's future.
NOT ME, WE.
Together, we make Louisville better for everyone.