36. Police Accountability & Constitutional Policing

Published:
Reading time: 14 min read

POLICY
DOCUMENT 36: POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY & CONSTITUTIONAL POLICING

Dave Biggers for
Louisville Mayor 2025


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Louisville stands at a crossroads. The murder of Breonna Taylor in
2020 exposed systemic failures in our police department that led to a
Department of Justice investigation finding a pattern of
unconstitutional policing. While the federal consent decree process was
dismissed in May 2025, the problems it identified remain. Louisville
must choose: return to the status quo that cost lives and eroded trust,
or build a police department that serves all residents with dignity,
accountability, and constitutional policing.

Dave Biggers believes policing must be effective AND
constitutional
. These are not competing values. Communities
with accountable, trusted police departments are safer because residents
cooperate with law enforcement. When communities don’t trust police,
crimes go unreported, witnesses don’t come forward, and safety suffers
for everyone.

The Challenge

The DOJ’s March 2023 findings documented pervasive problems:

  1. Unconstitutional Use of Force: Officers used
    unjustified force, including striking people who weren’t resisting,
    using neck restraints, and deploying K-9s excessively.

  2. Discriminatory Policing: Black residents
    disproportionately subjected to stops, searches, citations, and
    force—not explained by crime rates or other factors.

  3. Unlawful Search Warrant Practices: Deficient
    warrant applications, failure to knock-and-announce, insufficient
    post-search documentation—the very issues that led to Breonna Taylor’s
    death.

  4. First Amendment Violations: Retaliation against
    people who criticized or recorded police, unlawful arrests during
    protests.

  5. Failure to Investigate Misconduct: Internal
    investigations routinely incomplete, biased toward officers, missing key
    evidence.

Dave’s Vision

Dave will implement comprehensive police accountability reforms that
exceed the dismissed consent decree:

Independent Civilian Oversight Board ($2M annually):
True independence with subpoena power, investigative authority, and
binding disciplinary recommendations.

Use of Force Reforms ($1M annually): De-escalation
requirements, ban on chokeholds and no-knock warrants, early
intervention systems identifying problem officers.

Transparency & Data ($500K annually): Body
camera requirements, public data dashboards, open misconduct
records.

Constitutional Policing Training ($1.5M annually):
De-escalation, implicit bias, mental health crisis response, community
policing.

Community Accountability ($500K annually): Regular
community forums, precinct advisory councils, restorative justice
alternatives.

Budget Impact

This policy requires $5.5 million in new annual
spending
—funded through reallocation from settlement costs
(Louisville has paid $50M+ in misconduct settlements), federal grants,
and operational efficiencies from reduced misconduct incidents.

Why This Matters

Accountability makes policing more effective. When
communities trust police, they report crimes and cooperate as witnesses.
When they don’t, crimes go unsolved and violence increases. Chicago’s
police accountability reforms correlated with increased witness
cooperation and case clearance rates.

Accountability protects taxpayers. Louisville has
paid over $50 million in settlements for police misconduct. Every dollar
spent on prevention saves multiple dollars in lawsuits.

Accountability protects officers. Early intervention
systems identify officers struggling before misconduct occurs. Training
in de-escalation keeps officers safer.

Justice demands it. Breonna Taylor. Tae-Rone
Simpson. David McAtee. Louisville families deserve a police department
that values all lives equally.


CURRENT
SITUATION: LOUISVILLE’S POLICING CRISIS

DOJ Investigation
Findings (March 2023)

The Department of Justice conducted a comprehensive investigation
from April 2021 to March 2023, finding that Louisville Metro and
LMPD:

Use of Force: – Used unjustified neck restraints –
Struck people in the head with impact weapons when not warranted –
Deployed police dogs against people who were not resisting – Used
less-lethal weapons inappropriately – Failed to intervene when
witnessing misconduct

Search Warrants: – Sought warrants with false or
inaccurate information – Failed to properly knock and announce – Did not
adequately document warrant executions – Had no policies ensuring
accountability

Traffic Stops: – Conducted stops without reasonable
suspicion – Disproportionately stopped Black drivers – Searched vehicles
without legal justification – Made pretextual stops for minor violations
to investigate unrelated matters

Discrimination: – Black residents subject to
discriminatory enforcement – Racial disparities not explained by crime
rates – Bias in stop, search, arrest, and use of force decisions

First Amendment: – Arrested people for protected
speech (criticizing police) – Interfered with people recording police –
Unlawfully dispersed protesters – Retaliated against journalists

Internal Accountability: – Misconduct investigations
inadequate – Ignored or discredited civilian complaints – Failed to
identify patterns of officer misconduct – Discipline inconsistent and
inadequate

In December 2024, Louisville signed a consent decree with 81 key
objectives covering use of force, search warrants, traffic stops, and
misconduct investigations. The agreement was to be overseen by a federal
judge and independent monitor, with the current administration committing to
compliance within 5 years.

However, on May 21, 2025, the DOJ under the new
administration dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, ending federal
oversight before implementation began.

The current administration announced a “Community Commitment” to continue
reforms voluntarily. While LMPD has revised 260+ policies, without
federal oversight and an independent monitor, there’s no external
accountability for actual implementation.

Why Voluntary Reform Is
Insufficient

History shows police departments don’t reform themselves:

  1. No enforcement mechanism: Voluntary commitments can
    be abandoned when political winds shift
  2. No independent oversight: Internal review of police
    misconduct has inherent conflicts
  3. No public accountability: Without required
    reporting, the community can’t verify progress
  4. Policy vs. practice: Written policies mean nothing
    without enforcement

Louisville needs binding accountability, not
promises.


DAVE’S VISION:
ACCOUNTABLE, CONSTITUTIONAL POLICING

Dave Biggers believes effective policing requires community
trust
, and community trust requires
accountability
. This isn’t anti-police—it’s pro-community AND
pro-good-officers who are tarnished by colleagues’ misconduct.

Core Principles

  1. Independence: Oversight must be independent of the
    police department and mayor’s office
  2. Authority: Oversight bodies must have real
    power—subpoenas, investigations, discipline
  3. Transparency: Data and decisions must be public by
    default
  4. Community Voice: Those most affected by policing
    must have meaningful input
  5. Prevention: Identify problems before they become
    crises

Goals (4-Year Term)

By 2029, Dave will achieve:

  • Independent Civilian Oversight Board with subpoena
    power and binding disciplinary authority
  • 50% reduction in use-of-force incidents through
    de-escalation training and early intervention
  • Zero no-knock warrants executed except for imminent
    threat to life
  • 100% body camera compliance with footage publicly
    accessible
  • Public misconduct database searchable by
    officer
  • Quarterly community accountability forums in every
    Metro Council district
  • Reduced racial disparities in stops, searches,
    arrests, and force

DETAILED PROPOSALS

Proposal
1: Independent Civilian Oversight Board ($2M Annually)

What It Is

Louisville will establish a truly independent Civilian Oversight
Board (COB) with:

Structural Independence: – Board members appointed
by Metro Council (not Mayor or Police Chief) – Appointed from community
nominations – No current or former LMPD employees – Must include
representatives from communities most affected by policing – 5-year
staggered terms; removal only for cause

Investigative Authority:Subpoena
power
to compel documents and testimony (NACOLE Best Practices)
– Independent investigators (not former LMPD) – Access to all records,
body camera footage, internal affairs files – Authority to initiate
investigations without complaint – Authority to investigate patterns and
policies, not just individual incidents

Disciplinary Authority: – Binding recommendations on
discipline (Chief must implement or explain in writing) – Authority to
overturn inadequate internal discipline – Public reporting of all
disciplinary outcomes – Tracking of discipline by officer, type, and
outcome

Policy Authority: – Review and approve all
use-of-force policies before implementation – Authority to mandate
policy changes – Annual audit of department policies and practices

Why It Matters

Research shows civilian oversight is only effective when boards have
real power:

  • NACOLE survey: 38 of 64 oversight bodies have no investigative
    authority; 30 can’t issue subpoenas
  • Boards without subpoena power “can be stonewalled and denied access
    to critical documents”
  • The most effective oversight bodies are “adequately funded, granted
    subpoena power, and equipped with full investigatory and disciplinary
    power”

Louisville’s current Citizens Commission on Police
Accountability lacks these powers.
It can only review completed
internal investigations and make non-binding recommendations.

Budget

Annual Cost: $2 million

  • Board operations and staff: $1.2M (Executive Director, 4
    investigators, admin support)
  • Legal support: $400K (enforcement of subpoenas, legal review)
  • Technology and systems: $200K (case management, data analysis)
  • Community engagement: $200K (forums, translation,
    accessibility)

Implementation

Year 1 (2026): – Metro Council passes enabling
ordinance with full powers – Appoint initial board members through
community nomination process – Hire Executive Director and initial staff
– Establish policies and procedures

Year 2-4 (2027-2029): – Full operations: All serious
incidents reviewed – Pattern investigations initiated – Policy reviews
completed – Public reporting established


Proposal 2: Use of
Force Reforms ($1M Annually)

What It Is

Comprehensive reforms ensuring force is used only when necessary, at
the minimum level required, with full accountability.

Policy Reforms:

De-Escalation Requirement: – Officers must attempt
de-escalation before using force when feasible – Documented in every
use-of-force report – Failure to de-escalate is policy violation subject
to discipline

Force Continuum: – Clear, graduated levels of force
tied to specific threat levels – Require lowest effective level of force
– Prohibit escalation without corresponding threat increase

Prohibited Tactics:Chokeholds and neck
restraints:
Banned except where deadly force would be
authorized – No-knock warrants: Banned except where
there is imminent threat to life requiring immediate entry (requires
Chief approval and COB notification) – Shooting at moving
vehicles:
Banned except where vehicle is weapon and no
alternative – Warning shots: Prohibited

Duty to Intervene: – Officers must intervene to stop
excessive force by colleagues – Failure to intervene is discipline
equivalent to using excessive force – Protection from retaliation for
intervening

Early Intervention System: – Track use-of-force
incidents, complaints, lawsuits by officer – Automatic review when
officer exceeds thresholds – Mandatory intervention (training,
counseling, reassignment) before termination needed – Identify and
address problems before they become crises

Accountability: – All use-of-force incidents
documented within 24 hours – Supervisor review within 48 hours – Serious
force (injury, weapon discharge) reviewed by chain of command AND COB –
Annual public report on use-of-force statistics

Evidence Base

Research shows de-escalation training reduces use of force:

  • Seattle PD: De-escalation training reduced use of force 15% and
    injuries to officers 11%
  • Las Vegas Metro: De-escalation program reduced officer-involved
    shootings 36%
  • Studies show de-escalation makes officers safer, not less safe

Early intervention systems identify problem officers before serious
misconduct:

  • Phoenix PD: EIS identified officers who would later have sustained
    complaints with 70% accuracy
  • New Orleans: EIS-flagged officers 3x more likely to have subsequent
    complaints if not intervened upon

Budget

Annual Cost: $1 million

  • Early intervention system technology: $300K
  • Policy development and legal review: $200K
  • Use-of-force review unit (3 FTE): $350K
  • Data analysis and reporting: $150K

Proposal 3:
Transparency & Data ($500K Annually)

What It Is

Comprehensive transparency ensuring the public can verify
accountability.

Body Camera Requirements: – 100% of uniformed
officers equipped – Cameras activated for all law enforcement activities
– Footage retained minimum 180 days; 3 years for use-of-force or
complaints – Footage available to subjects of encounters within 7 days
upon request – Footage publicly released within 30 days for serious
incidents

Public Data Dashboard: – Real-time data on stops,
searches, arrests, use of force – Disaggregated by race, geography,
time, officer – Searchable by public – Updated weekly

Misconduct Database: – All sustained complaints
public and searchable – Officer discipline history accessible –
Settlement payments tracked and reported – Prevents problem officers
from hiding history

Open Records: – All department policies publicly
posted – Training curricula available – Internal affairs procedures
transparent – Budget and spending detail accessible

Budget

Annual Cost: $500,000

  • Dashboard development and maintenance: $200K
  • Body camera program expansion: $150K
  • Records management and FOIA compliance: $100K
  • Data analysis staff: $50K

Proposal
4: Constitutional Policing Training ($1.5M Annually)

What It Is

Comprehensive training ensuring every officer knows constitutional
limits and has skills to police effectively within them.

De-Escalation Training (40 hours annually): – Crisis
communication – Tactical repositioning – Time and distance – Recognizing
mental health crises – Scenario-based exercises

Implicit Bias Training (16 hours annually):
Understanding how bias affects decision-making – Strategies to
counteract bias – Data on Louisville’s racial disparities –
Accountability for biased policing

Mental Health Crisis Response (24 hours annually):
Recognizing mental health emergencies – De-escalation specific to mental
health – Coordination with Crisis Intervention Team – Alternatives to
arrest for mental health calls

Constitutional Law (16 hours annually): – Fourth
Amendment (search and seizure) – First Amendment (free speech, recording
police) – Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) – Case law updates

Community Policing (16 hours annually): – Procedural
justice (treating people fairly) – Community engagement techniques –
Problem-oriented policing – Building trust in diverse communities

Budget

Annual Cost: $1.5 million

  • Training development and delivery: $800K
  • Outside trainers and experts: $300K
  • Overtime for training attendance: $300K
  • Materials and facilities: $100K

Proposal 5:
Community Accountability ($500K Annually)

What It Is

Structures ensuring community voice in policing priorities and
practices.

Precinct Advisory Councils: – Elected residents from
each LMPD division – Monthly meetings with division commanders – Input
on priorities, deployment, problem areas – Review of division-level
data

Quarterly Community Forums: – Public forums in each
Metro Council district – Chief and command staff attend – Community
questions and concerns heard – Public reporting on responses to prior
concerns

Restorative Justice Alternatives: – For eligible
offenses, option for restorative process instead of prosecution –
Victim-offender dialogue facilitated by trained mediators – Restitution
and community service – Reduced recidivism compared to traditional
prosecution

Youth Police Relations: – Youth advisory council to
COB – School resource officer accountability – Programs building
positive relationships before enforcement contact

Budget

Annual Cost: $500,000

  • Precinct advisory council support: $150K
  • Community forum coordination: $100K
  • Restorative justice program: $200K
  • Youth programs: $50K

IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE

Year 1 (2026): Foundation

  • Pass COB ordinance with full powers
  • Ban no-knock warrants (except imminent threat)
  • Implement duty to intervene policy
  • Begin de-escalation training program
  • Launch body camera compliance initiative

Year 2 (2027): Build Capacity

  • COB fully operational
  • Early intervention system deployed
  • Public data dashboard launched
  • All officers complete initial training curriculum
  • Precinct advisory councils established

Year 3 (2028): Full
Implementation

  • 100% body camera compliance achieved
  • Misconduct database searchable
  • Restorative justice program launched
  • Pattern investigations by COB
  • First annual accountability report

Year 4 (2029): Measure Results

  • Evaluate use-of-force trends (target: 50% reduction)
  • Assess racial disparity data (target: measurable reduction)
  • Community trust surveys
  • Adjust policies based on outcomes
  • Model for other cities

BUDGET SUMMARY

ComponentAnnual Cost
Civilian Oversight Board$2,000,000
Use of Force Reforms$1,000,000
Transparency & Data$500,000
Constitutional Policing Training$1,500,000
Community Accountability$500,000
TOTAL$5,500,000

Funding Sources: – Settlement cost reduction: $2M
(Louisville pays $5-10M annually in misconduct settlements) – Federal
grants (DOJ COPS, BJA): $1.5M – General fund reallocation: $2M

Return on Investment: – Reduced settlements save
$2-5M annually – Improved clearance rates (community cooperation) –
Reduced officer injuries and turnover – Avoided federal oversight
costs


WHY THIS MATTERS

For Breonna Taylor. Her death exposed systemic
failures that remain unaddressed. Louisville owes her family—and all
families—a police department that values life and follows the
Constitution.

For all Louisville residents. Everyone deserves to
feel safe in their community AND safe from unconstitutional policing.
These are not competing values.

For good police officers. The majority of officers
serve honorably. They deserve a department where misconduct is
identified and addressed, not one where bad actors tarnish everyone.

For Louisville’s future. Cities with accountable,
trusted police departments are safer and more prosperous. Young people
and businesses choose communities where everyone is treated fairly.

Dave Biggers will build a Louisville Police Department that is
effective, constitutional, and accountable to the community it
serves.


SOURCES


📍 What This Means for YOUR Neighborhood

Every Louisville neighborhood is unique. Enter your ZIP code to see how this policy directly impacts your community:

Find Your Mini Substation

Enter your ZIP code to see when your neighborhood will receive a community police substation.

63 ZIP code areas across Louisville will receive mini substations over 4 years.

Part of Dave Biggers' comprehensive public safety plan.

💰 See the Budget Impact

Explore how this policy fits into Dave’s comprehensive $1.2 billion budget plan:

How Does Dave's Budget Affect You?

See your personalized impact - zero tax increase, real benefits

Your Personal Impact

How we calculate: Benefits based on average family savings from wellness center access ($800/year), youth program value (after-school + summer jobs), and your specific mini substation timeline. All benefits come from the same $1.2B budget - zero tax increase.

⚖️ Compare This Policy

See how Dave’s approach differs from current administration policies:

⚖️ Policy Comparison: Real Change vs. Status Quo

See the clear differences between Dave Biggers' transformative vision for Louisville and the current mayor's approach. The choice is yours.

🚔

Public Safety & Policing

Current Mayor

Traditional policing model

Approach

  • Centralized police response
  • Reactive approach to crime
  • Limited community engagement
  • Focus on patrol units
Timeline Ongoing
Budget Status quo funding
Impact Response times: 15-20 minutes average

Dave Biggers

Community-based mini substations

Approach

  • 63 mini substations across Louisville (4-year deployment)
  • Officers living and working in communities they serve
  • Preventative community policing model
  • Year 1: 12 substations in highest-need areas
Timeline Year 1-4 phased rollout
Budget Revenue-neutral through property tax restructuring
Impact Response times: 3-5 minutes (neighborhood-based)
🏥

Mental Health & Wellness

Current Mayor

Limited wellness infrastructure

Approach

  • Reliance on existing healthcare facilities
  • No dedicated community wellness centers
  • Fragmented mental health services
  • Emergency-room dependent model
Timeline No expansion planned
Budget Minimal dedicated funding
Impact Long wait times, limited access in underserved areas

Dave Biggers

Regional wellness centers network

Approach

  • 18 wellness centers across 6 regions
  • Mental health counseling, addiction support
  • Youth programs, family services
  • 3 centers per region for accessibility
Timeline Year 1-4 phased rollout
Budget Integrated with public safety restructuring
Impact Accessible care within every neighborhood, preventative focus
🎓

Youth Development

Current Mayor

Standard recreation programs

Approach

  • Traditional rec centers
  • Limited after-school programming
  • Seasonal sports leagues
  • Minimal job training for youth
Timeline Status quo
Budget Existing recreation budget
Impact Serves fraction of Louisville youth

Dave Biggers

Comprehensive youth investment

Approach

  • After-school programs at all substations
  • Job training and mentorship
  • Arts, sports, and STEM programs
  • Youth advisory councils
  • Summer employment pathways
Timeline Immediate implementation with substation rollout
Budget $1,200 value per child annually
Impact Accessible programs in every neighborhood
💼

Economic Development

Current Mayor

Corporate incentives focus

Approach

  • Tax breaks for large corporations
  • Downtown-centric development
  • Limited support for small business
  • Gentrification without displacement protection
Timeline Ongoing
Budget Millions in corporate subsidies
Impact Benefits concentrated in select areas

Dave Biggers

Community wealth building

Approach

  • Small business incubators at substations
  • Local hiring requirements for city contracts
  • Neighborhood-based economic zones
  • Affordable housing protection
  • Living wage standards
Timeline Immediate policy changes, 4-year infrastructure build
Budget Redirected from corporate subsidies
Impact Jobs and wealth stay in neighborhoods
🏠

Housing & Affordability

Current Mayor

Market-driven housing

Approach

  • Minimal affordable housing requirements
  • Limited tenant protections
  • Rising rents in many neighborhoods
  • Displacement from development
Timeline No comprehensive plan
Budget Minimal housing trust fund
Impact Affordability crisis worsening

Dave Biggers

Housing as a human right

Approach

  • Expanded affordable housing trust fund
  • Strong tenant protections
  • Community land trusts
  • Rent stabilization measures
  • Anti-displacement policies for existing residents
Timeline Immediate policy changes
Budget Increased trust fund through property tax reform
Impact Protects residents, prevents displacement
📊

Government Transparency

Current Mayor

Standard reporting

Approach

  • Annual budget reports
  • Limited real-time data
  • Reactive public engagement
  • Closed-door development deals
Timeline Status quo
Budget Minimal transparency infrastructure
Impact Limited public accountability

Dave Biggers

Radical transparency

Approach

  • Real-time budget dashboard
  • Public data portal for all city metrics
  • Community advisory boards with veto power
  • Open contracting process
  • Regular town halls in all neighborhoods
Timeline Immediate implementation
Budget Low-cost digital infrastructure
Impact Citizens empowered with information and decision-making power

The Choice is Clear

Louisville deserves transformative change, not more of the same. Join us in building a city that works for everyone.

🗣️ What Louisville Residents Say

[dbpm_testimonials limit=”3″]

✅ Community Endorsements

[dbpm_endorsements limit=”5″]


Share This Policy

Help spread the word about Dave’s vision for Louisville:

[dbpm_share_buttons]

[policy_recommendations limit=”3″]

🗳️ Make Your Voice Heard

Register to Vote

[dbpm_voter_registration]

Find Your Polling Place

[dbpm_polling_locator]

💡 Have Ideas to Improve This Policy?

This is YOUR city. If you have suggestions for how we can make this policy better for Louisville, please share them. Every idea is reviewed.

Suggest an Improvement for Louisville

Have an idea for improving Louisville? Share your policy suggestion below. Your voice matters in shaping our city's future.

0/2000 characters

NOT ME, WE.

Together, we make Louisville better for everyone.

Scroll to Top